2021
Cooke, S. J.; Bergman, J. N.; Madliger, C. L.; Cramp, R. L.; Beardall, J.; Burness, G. P.; Clark, T. D.; Dantzer, B.; de la Barrera, E.; Fangue, N. A.; Franklin, C. F.; Fuller, A.; Hawkes, L. A.; Hultine, K. R.; Hunt, K. E.; Love, O. P.; MacMillan, H. A.; Mandelman, J. W.; Mark, F. C.; Martin, L. B.; Newmann, A. E. M.; Nicotra, A. B.; Raby, G. D.; Robinson, S. A.; Ropert-Courdet, Y.; Rummer, J. L.; Seebacher, F.; Todgham, A. E.; Tomlinson, S.; Chown, S. L.
One hundred questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice Journal Article
In: Conservation Physiology, vol. 9, pp. coab009, 2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, conservation decisions, conservation physiology, ecophysiology
@article{Cooke2021,
title = {One hundred questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice},
author = {S. J. Cooke and J. N. Bergman and C. L. Madliger and R. L. Cramp and J. Beardall and G. P. Burness and T. D. Clark and B. Dantzer and E. de la Barrera and N. A. Fangue and C. F. Franklin and A. Fuller and L. A. Hawkes and K. R. Hultine and K. E. Hunt and O. P. Love and H. A. MacMillan and J. W. Mandelman and F. C. Mark and L. B. Martin and A. E. M. Newmann and A. B. Nicotra and G. D. Raby and S. A. Robinson and Y. Ropert-Courdet and J. L. Rummer and F. Seebacher and A.E. Todgham and S. Tomlinson and S. L. Chown },
url = {https://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/9/1/coab009/6214572},
doi = {10.1093/conphys/coab009},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-04-07},
journal = {Conservation Physiology},
volume = {9},
pages = {coab009},
abstract = {Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human–induced environmental change; (iii) human–wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.},
keywords = {anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, conservation decisions, conservation physiology, ecophysiology},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human–induced environmental change; (iii) human–wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.
2020
Cooke, S. J.; Madliger, C. L.; Cramp, R. L.; Beardall, J.; Burness, G. P.; Chown, S. L.; Clark, T. D.; Dantzer, B.; de la Barrera, E.; Fangue, N. A.; Franklin, C. F.; Fuller, A.; Hawkes, L. A.; Hultine, K. R.; Hunt, K. E.; Love, O. P.; MacMillan, H. A.; Mandelman, J. W.; Mark, F. C.; Martin, L. B.; Newmann, A. E. M.; Nicotra, A. B.; Robinson, S. A.; Ropert-Courdet, Y.; Rummer, J. L.; Seebacher, F.; Todgham, A. E.
Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan Journal Article
In: Conservation Physiology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. coaa016, 2020.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: conservation physiology, ecophysiology, evidence, horizon scan, sustainability, sustainable development goals
@article{Cooke2020,
title = {Reframing conservation physiology to be more inclusive, integrative, relevant and forward-looking: reflections and a horizon scan},
author = {S. J. Cooke and C. L. Madliger and R. L. Cramp and J. Beardall and G. P. Burness and S. L. Chown and T. D. Clark and B. Dantzer and E. de la Barrera and N. A. Fangue and C. F. Franklin and A. Fuller and L. A. Hawkes and K. R. Hultine and K. E. Hunt and O. P. Love and H. A. MacMillan and J. W. Mandelman and F. C. Mark and L. B. Martin and A. E. M. Newmann and A. B. Nicotra and S. A. Robinson and Y. Ropert-Courdet and J. L. Rummer and F. Seebacher and A.E. Todgham},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/8/1/coaa016/5815645},
doi = {10.1093/conphys/coaa016},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-04-04},
journal = {Conservation Physiology},
volume = {8},
number = {1},
pages = {coaa016},
abstract = {Applying physiological tools, knowledge and concepts to understand conservation problems (i.e. conservation physiology) has become commonplace and confers an ability to understand mechanistic processes, develop predictive models and identify cause-and-effect relationships. Conservation physiology is making contributions to conservation solutions; the number of ‘success stories’ is growing, but there remain unexplored opportunities for which conservation physiology shows immense promise and has the potential to contribute to major advances in protecting and restoring biodiversity. Here, we consider how conservation physiology has evolved with a focus on reframing the discipline to be more inclusive and integrative. Using a ‘horizon scan’, we further explore ways in which conservation physiology can be more relevant to pressing conservation issues of today (e.g. addressing the Sustainable Development Goals; delivering science to support the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration), as well as more forward-looking to inform emerging issues and policies for tomorrow. Our horizon scan provides evidence that, as the discipline of conservation physiology continues to mature, it provides a wealth of opportunities to promote integration, inclusivity and forward-thinking goals that contribute to achieving conservation gains. To advance environmental management and ecosystem restoration, we need to ensure that the underlying science (such as that generated by conservation physiology) is relevant with accompanying messaging that is straightforward and accessible to end users.},
keywords = {conservation physiology, ecophysiology, evidence, horizon scan, sustainability, sustainable development goals},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Applying physiological tools, knowledge and concepts to understand conservation problems (i.e. conservation physiology) has become commonplace and confers an ability to understand mechanistic processes, develop predictive models and identify cause-and-effect relationships. Conservation physiology is making contributions to conservation solutions; the number of ‘success stories’ is growing, but there remain unexplored opportunities for which conservation physiology shows immense promise and has the potential to contribute to major advances in protecting and restoring biodiversity. Here, we consider how conservation physiology has evolved with a focus on reframing the discipline to be more inclusive and integrative. Using a ‘horizon scan’, we further explore ways in which conservation physiology can be more relevant to pressing conservation issues of today (e.g. addressing the Sustainable Development Goals; delivering science to support the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration), as well as more forward-looking to inform emerging issues and policies for tomorrow. Our horizon scan provides evidence that, as the discipline of conservation physiology continues to mature, it provides a wealth of opportunities to promote integration, inclusivity and forward-thinking goals that contribute to achieving conservation gains. To advance environmental management and ecosystem restoration, we need to ensure that the underlying science (such as that generated by conservation physiology) is relevant with accompanying messaging that is straightforward and accessible to end users.
2016
Díaz-Álvarez, E. A.; Reyes-García, C.; de la Barrera, E.
A δ15N assessment of nitrogen deposition for the endangered epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa from a city and an oak forest in Mexico Journal Article
In: Journal of Plant Research, vol. 129, pp. 863–872, 2016.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: conservation physiology, global change, moss, Neo-volcanic axis, nitrogen, orchid, pollution, stable isotopes, urban ecology
@article{Díaz-Álvarez2016b,
title = {A δ15N assessment of nitrogen deposition for the endangered epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa from a city and an oak forest in Mexico},
author = {E. A. Díaz-Álvarez and C. Reyes-García and E. de la Barrera },
url = {http://rdcu.be/npd1
http://agro.mx/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/039-Diaz-Alvarez-laelia-rv3.pdf
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10265-016-0843-y},
doi = {10.1007/s10265-016-0843-y},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-06-09},
journal = {Journal of Plant Research},
volume = {129},
pages = {863–872},
abstract = {Atmospheric nitrogen deposition poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Tropical epiphytic plants are especially at risk given their reliance on atmospheric sources of nutrients. The leaf, pseudobulb, and root carbon and nitrogen content, C:N ratio, as well as the nitrogen isotopic composition were studied for individuals of Laelia speciosa from a city and from an oak forest in Mexico. The nitrogen content of leaves was similar between the city and the oak forest, reaching 1.3 ± 0.2 % (dry mass). The δ15N of leaves, pseudobulbs, and roots reached 5.6 ± 0.2 ‰ in the city, values found in sites exposed to industrial and vehicular activities. The δ15N for plant from the oak forest amounted to –3.1 ± 0.3 ‰, which is similar to values measured from sites with low industrial activities. Some orchids such as Laelia speciosa produce a single pseudobulb per year, i.e., a water and nutrient storage organ, so the interannual nitrogen deposition was studied by considering the ten most recent pseudobulbs for plants from either site formed between 2003 and 2012. The C:N ratio of the ten most recent pseudobulbs from the oak forest, as well as that of the pseudobulbs formed before 2010 for plants in the city were indistinguishable from each other, averaging 132.4 ± 6.5, while it was lower for the two most recent pseudobulbs in the city. The δ15N values of pseudobulbs from the oak forest averaged ‒4.4 ± 0.1 ‰ for the entire series. The δ15N ranged from 0.1 ± 1.6 ‰ for the oldest pseudobulb to 4.7 ± 0.2 ‰ for the pseudobulb formed in the city from 2008 onwards. Isotopic analysis and the C:N ratio for L. speciosa revealed that rates of nitrogen deposition were higher in the city than in the forest. The δ15N values of series of pseudobulbs showed that it is possible to track nitrogen deposition over multiple years.},
keywords = {conservation physiology, global change, moss, Neo-volcanic axis, nitrogen, orchid, pollution, stable isotopes, urban ecology},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Atmospheric nitrogen deposition poses a major threat to global biodiversity. Tropical epiphytic plants are especially at risk given their reliance on atmospheric sources of nutrients. The leaf, pseudobulb, and root carbon and nitrogen content, C:N ratio, as well as the nitrogen isotopic composition were studied for individuals of Laelia speciosa from a city and from an oak forest in Mexico. The nitrogen content of leaves was similar between the city and the oak forest, reaching 1.3 ± 0.2 % (dry mass). The δ15N of leaves, pseudobulbs, and roots reached 5.6 ± 0.2 ‰ in the city, values found in sites exposed to industrial and vehicular activities. The δ15N for plant from the oak forest amounted to –3.1 ± 0.3 ‰, which is similar to values measured from sites with low industrial activities. Some orchids such as Laelia speciosa produce a single pseudobulb per year, i.e., a water and nutrient storage organ, so the interannual nitrogen deposition was studied by considering the ten most recent pseudobulbs for plants from either site formed between 2003 and 2012. The C:N ratio of the ten most recent pseudobulbs from the oak forest, as well as that of the pseudobulbs formed before 2010 for plants in the city were indistinguishable from each other, averaging 132.4 ± 6.5, while it was lower for the two most recent pseudobulbs in the city. The δ15N values of pseudobulbs from the oak forest averaged ‒4.4 ± 0.1 ‰ for the entire series. The δ15N ranged from 0.1 ± 1.6 ‰ for the oldest pseudobulb to 4.7 ± 0.2 ‰ for the pseudobulb formed in the city from 2008 onwards. Isotopic analysis and the C:N ratio for L. speciosa revealed that rates of nitrogen deposition were higher in the city than in the forest. The δ15N values of series of pseudobulbs showed that it is possible to track nitrogen deposition over multiple years.
2015
Gudiño, W.; Ávila-Díaz, I.; Oyama, K.; de la Barrera, E.
High-temperature tolerance by the endangered Mexican orchid Laelia speciosa Journal Article
In: Tropical Conservation Science, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 983-991, 2015.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: assisted migration, climate change, conservation physiology, ecological niche, global warming, Laelia, orchid, temperature, tissue culture
@article{Gudiño2015b,
title = {High-temperature tolerance by the endangered Mexican orchid \textit{Laelia speciosa}},
author = {W. Gudiño and I. Ávila-Díaz and K. Oyama and E. de la Barrera },
url = {http://tropicalconservationscience.mongabay.com/content/v8/tcs_v8i4_983-991_Gudino.pdf},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-12-13},
journal = {Tropical Conservation Science},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {983-991},
keywords = {assisted migration, climate change, conservation physiology, ecological niche, global warming, Laelia, orchid, temperature, tissue culture},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Díaz-Álvarez, E. A.; Lindig-Cisneros, R.; de la Barrera, E.
Responses to simulated nitrogen deposition by the neotropical epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa Journal Article
In: PeerJ, vol. 3, pp. e1021, 2015.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: acid rain, biodiversity, CAM, conservation physiology, d15N, global change, Laelia, neotropical, nitrogen, orchid, plant nutrition, pollution, stable isotopes
@article{Díaz-Álvarez2015,
title = {Responses to simulated nitrogen deposition by the neotropical epiphytic orchid Laelia speciosa},
author = {E. A. Díaz-Álvarez and R. Lindig-Cisneros and E. de la Barrera},
url = {https://peerj.com/articles/1021/
http://agro.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/031-Díaz-Alvarez-et-al-2015-PeerJ-Laelia.pdf},
doi = {10.7717/peerj.1021},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-06-18},
journal = {PeerJ},
volume = {3},
pages = {e1021},
abstract = {Potential ecophysiological responses to nitrogen deposition, which is considered to be one of the leading causes for global biodiversity loss, were studied for the endangered endemic Mexican epiphytic orchid, Laelia speciosa, via a shadehouse dose-response experiment (doses were 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 kg N ha-1 yr-1) in order to assess the potential risk facing this orchid given impending scenarios of nitrogen deposition. Lower doses of nitrogen of up to 20 kg N ha yr–1, the dose that led to optimal plant performance, acted as fertilizer. For instance, the production of leaves and pseudobulbs were respectively 35% and 36% greater for plants receiving 20 kg N ha yr–1 than under any other dose. Also, the chlorophyll content and quantum yield peaked at 0.66 ± 0.03 g m-2 and 0.85 ± 0.01, respectively, for plants growing under the optimum dose. In contrast, toxic effects were observed at the higher doses of 40 and 80 kg N ha yr–1. The δ13C for leaves averaged –14.7 ± 0.2‰ regardless of the nitrogen dose. In turn, δ15N decreased as the nitrogen dose increased from 0.9 ±0.1‰ under 2.5 kg N ha-1 yr-1 to – 3.1 ± 0.2 ‰ under 80 kg N ha-1 yr-1, indicating that orchids preferentially assimilate NH4+ rather than NO3– of the solution under higher doses of nitrogen. Laelia speciosa showed a clear response to inputs of nitrogen, thus, increasing rates of atmospheric nitrogen deposition can pose an important threat for this species.},
keywords = {acid rain, biodiversity, CAM, conservation physiology, d15N, global change, Laelia, neotropical, nitrogen, orchid, plant nutrition, pollution, stable isotopes},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Potential ecophysiological responses to nitrogen deposition, which is considered to be one of the leading causes for global biodiversity loss, were studied for the endangered endemic Mexican epiphytic orchid, Laelia speciosa, via a shadehouse dose-response experiment (doses were 2.5, 5, 10, 20, 40, and 80 kg N ha-1 yr-1) in order to assess the potential risk facing this orchid given impending scenarios of nitrogen deposition. Lower doses of nitrogen of up to 20 kg N ha yr–1, the dose that led to optimal plant performance, acted as fertilizer. For instance, the production of leaves and pseudobulbs were respectively 35% and 36% greater for plants receiving 20 kg N ha yr–1 than under any other dose. Also, the chlorophyll content and quantum yield peaked at 0.66 ± 0.03 g m-2 and 0.85 ± 0.01, respectively, for plants growing under the optimum dose. In contrast, toxic effects were observed at the higher doses of 40 and 80 kg N ha yr–1. The δ13C for leaves averaged –14.7 ± 0.2‰ regardless of the nitrogen dose. In turn, δ15N decreased as the nitrogen dose increased from 0.9 ±0.1‰ under 2.5 kg N ha-1 yr-1 to – 3.1 ± 0.2 ‰ under 80 kg N ha-1 yr-1, indicating that orchids preferentially assimilate NH4+ rather than NO3– of the solution under higher doses of nitrogen. Laelia speciosa showed a clear response to inputs of nitrogen, thus, increasing rates of atmospheric nitrogen deposition can pose an important threat for this species.
2013
Soto-Correa, J. C.; Sáenz-Romero, C.; Lindig-Cisneros, R.; de la Barrera, E.
The neotropical shrub Lupinus elegans, from temperate forests, may not adapt to climate change Journal Article
In: Plant Biology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 607-610, 2013.
Links | BibTeX | Tags: acclimation, climate change, conservation physiology, global warming, LT50, Lupinus, shrub, temperate forest, temperature, tolerance, understory
@article{Soto-Correa2013,
title = {The neotropical shrub Lupinus elegans, from temperate forests, may not adapt to climate change},
author = {J. C. Soto-Correa and C. Sáenz-Romero and R. Lindig-Cisneros and E. de la Barrera },
url = {http://agro.mx/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/027-Soto-Correa-2013.pdf},
doi = {10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00716.x},
year = {2013},
date = {2013-01-01},
journal = {Plant Biology},
volume = {15},
number = {3},
pages = {607-610},
keywords = {acclimation, climate change, conservation physiology, global warming, LT50, Lupinus, shrub, temperate forest, temperature, tolerance, understory},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}