2021
Martínez, D. N.; López-Toledo, L.; Espinosa-García, F.; Camacho-Cervantes, M.; de la Barrera, E.
Ephemeral visitors or permanent residents? — Decadal change in the ruderal vegetation from a periurban university campus Journal Article
In: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, vol. 65, pp. 127372, 2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, Bioindicator, disturbance, invasive species, land-use change, urban ecology, urban sprawl
@article{Martínez2021c,
title = {Ephemeral visitors or permanent residents? — Decadal change in the ruderal vegetation from a periurban university campus},
author = {D. N. Martínez and L. López-Toledo and F. Espinosa-García and M. Camacho-Cervantes and E. de la Barrera},
url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161886672100399X},
doi = {10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127372},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-10-11},
urldate = {2021-10-11},
journal = {Urban Forestry and Urban Greening},
volume = {65},
pages = {127372},
abstract = {Highlights
• Anthropogenic disturbance (built area) increased in the study site over the years.
• Species richness and the proportion of exotic species increased with disturbance.
• The most diverse families of ruderal flora were Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae.
• The 16 species that disappeared after 2008 were native.
• Thirteen of the exotic species found in the study site are invasive in Mexico.
Abstract
Urbanization creates environmental conditions that hinder the growth of natural vegetation. We surveyed the ruderal vegetation from a periurban university campus in west-central Mexico during the rainy seasons of 2008 and 2016–2018, time during which the campus underwent intensive construction. The built area grew from 4 ha in 2009 to 12.6 ha in 2017. We identified 234 different Angiosperms belonging to 165 genera and 43 families and the community composition changed over time. For example, Asteraceae was replaced by Poaceae as the richest family in 2018. Also, 16 native species found in 2008 disappeared from the study site, 9 of which have been related with low disturbance. In contrast, 98 new species were observed in the latter years, including some that are commonly found in cities. Overall, species richness increased with time, including that of exotic species that increased from 16 % of the total species in 2008 to 24 % in 2018. Thirteen of such exotic species are invasive in Mexico, including Digitaria velutina, Asphodelus fistulosus, Mercurialis annua, and Senecio inaequidens, for which this was their first record in the city of Morelia (population 849,053), where the campus is located. These results suggest that environmental conditions imposed by disturbance can favor the proliferation of various species, especially grasses and several exotic species of different families.},
keywords = {anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, Bioindicator, disturbance, invasive species, land-use change, urban ecology, urban sprawl},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
• Anthropogenic disturbance (built area) increased in the study site over the years.
• Species richness and the proportion of exotic species increased with disturbance.
• The most diverse families of ruderal flora were Asteraceae, Fabaceae, and Poaceae.
• The 16 species that disappeared after 2008 were native.
• Thirteen of the exotic species found in the study site are invasive in Mexico.
Abstract
Urbanization creates environmental conditions that hinder the growth of natural vegetation. We surveyed the ruderal vegetation from a periurban university campus in west-central Mexico during the rainy seasons of 2008 and 2016–2018, time during which the campus underwent intensive construction. The built area grew from 4 ha in 2009 to 12.6 ha in 2017. We identified 234 different Angiosperms belonging to 165 genera and 43 families and the community composition changed over time. For example, Asteraceae was replaced by Poaceae as the richest family in 2018. Also, 16 native species found in 2008 disappeared from the study site, 9 of which have been related with low disturbance. In contrast, 98 new species were observed in the latter years, including some that are commonly found in cities. Overall, species richness increased with time, including that of exotic species that increased from 16 % of the total species in 2008 to 24 % in 2018. Thirteen of such exotic species are invasive in Mexico, including Digitaria velutina, Asphodelus fistulosus, Mercurialis annua, and Senecio inaequidens, for which this was their first record in the city of Morelia (population 849,053), where the campus is located. These results suggest that environmental conditions imposed by disturbance can favor the proliferation of various species, especially grasses and several exotic species of different families.
Cooke, S. J.; Bergman, J. N.; Madliger, C. L.; Cramp, R. L.; Beardall, J.; Burness, G. P.; Clark, T. D.; Dantzer, B.; de la Barrera, E.; Fangue, N. A.; Franklin, C. F.; Fuller, A.; Hawkes, L. A.; Hultine, K. R.; Hunt, K. E.; Love, O. P.; MacMillan, H. A.; Mandelman, J. W.; Mark, F. C.; Martin, L. B.; Newmann, A. E. M.; Nicotra, A. B.; Raby, G. D.; Robinson, S. A.; Ropert-Courdet, Y.; Rummer, J. L.; Seebacher, F.; Todgham, A. E.; Tomlinson, S.; Chown, S. L.
One hundred questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice Journal Article
In: Conservation Physiology, vol. 9, pp. coab009, 2021.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, conservation decisions, conservation physiology, ecophysiology
@article{Cooke2021,
title = {One hundred questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice},
author = {S. J. Cooke and J. N. Bergman and C. L. Madliger and R. L. Cramp and J. Beardall and G. P. Burness and T. D. Clark and B. Dantzer and E. de la Barrera and N. A. Fangue and C. F. Franklin and A. Fuller and L. A. Hawkes and K. R. Hultine and K. E. Hunt and O. P. Love and H. A. MacMillan and J. W. Mandelman and F. C. Mark and L. B. Martin and A. E. M. Newmann and A. B. Nicotra and G. D. Raby and S. A. Robinson and Y. Ropert-Courdet and J. L. Rummer and F. Seebacher and A.E. Todgham and S. Tomlinson and S. L. Chown },
url = {https://academic.oup.com/conphys/article/9/1/coab009/6214572},
doi = {10.1093/conphys/coab009},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-04-07},
journal = {Conservation Physiology},
volume = {9},
pages = {coab009},
abstract = {Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human–induced environmental change; (iii) human–wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.},
keywords = {anthropocene, biodiversity, biodiversity threats, conservation decisions, conservation physiology, ecophysiology},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}